Judges, examiners and caseworkers · leniency as an instrument
Judge and examiner designs
When cases are assigned at random to judges, examiners or caseworkers who differ in leniency, leniency can serve as an instrument for the decision. The agent simulates such designs with a known true effect. It runs the checklist from the two practitioner guides with CJIVE, UJIVE and the tests for monotonicity.
Open Judge and examiner designs
Guides: Chyn, Frandsen and Leslie (2025, JEL) and Goldsmith-Pinkham, Hull and Kolesár (2026, JEP). The tools begin with jd_. Data: simulated.
Instrumental variables · when the effect varies
Instrumental variables
A valid instrument identifies the effect for the compliers, not for everyone. The agent simulates designs with a known ATE and LATE. It runs Wald, 2SLS with several instruments, the Imbens-Rubin complier distributions, marginal treatment effects and bounds, with the checklist from the Handbook chapter.
Open Instrumental variables
Papers: Imbens and Angrist (1994), Imbens and Rubin (1997), Mogstad, Torgovitsky and Walters (2021) and Mogstad and Torgovitsky (2024, Handbook). The tools begin with iv_. Data: simulated.
Firms · wage effects and sorting
Firms and wages
How much of pay comes from the firm, and how much from who works there? With few movers per firm, fixed effects overstate the variance of firm effects and understate sorting. The agent simulates linked panels with a known truth and runs AKM, FE-HO, the leave-out correction and BLM. It also runs the exercises from Bonhomme et al. and computes the markdown under monopsony.
Open Firms and wages
Papers: Kline (2025, Firm Wage Effects), Kline (2025, Handbook, monopsony), Bonhomme, Lamadon and Manresa (2019) and Bonhomme, Holzheu, Lamadon, Manresa, Mogstad and Setzler (2023). The tools begin with fe_. Data: simulated.
Wage dynamics · job search and human capital
Wage dynamics
Wages grow over a career because workers gain human capital, move to better firms and get raises when employers match outside offers. The agent solves and simulates the equilibrium search model of Bagger et al. at the published estimates or at your own values. It splits wage growth over the first 20 years into these sources. The Python code can be downloaded.
Open Wage dynamics
Paper: Bagger, Fontaine, Postel-Vinay and Robin (2014, AER). The tools begin with bfpr_. Data: the authors' published estimates and data moments, and simulations from the model.